Nobody can say who owns a shared site or folder anymore
It was set up years ago, for a project that finished, and it's still being used by habit.
Enterprise engineering
Make sensitive information easier to find, share and protect. Kritical turns your approved privacy and records requirements into usable access, collaboration, retention and handover controls.
On this page
Jump to the part that matches the problem or decision in front of you.
It was set up years ago, for a project that finished, and it's still being used by habit.
Files moved; the structure and metadata that made them findable didn't come with them.
Legal or the business has decided what to keep and for how long; nobody's turned that into configuration yet.
Perhaps teams keep several versions of the same document, nobody knows who owns a shared site, or a migration has left important records difficult to find. We map the repositories, business processes, owners and access paths involved. A focused review identifies a practical first improvement without assuming every file or application needs to move.
Agree how teams organise working documents and records, what information helps people find them and who can approve access. We scope collaboration and records work across Microsoft 365, SharePoint and connected systems, considering shared spaces, external collaboration and staff changes so the structure stays understandable after the initial cleanup.

Your records, legal and business owners decide what must be kept, for how long and under which exceptions. We map those approved requirements to the relevant systems, configuration and operating procedures.
Moving documents also means dealing with metadata, ownership, versions and permissions. We establish what should move, what needs review and how the receiving system represents it, agreeing mapping, representative checks and the handling of exceptions before a wider transfer. Your information owners approve disposal and retention decisions; deletion is never treated as an automatic cleanup step.

A scoped engagement is quoted in writing and can deliver a repository and ownership map, proposed information structure, access model, migration plan and a prioritised set of technical changes. Implementation includes the agreed checks and operating instructions. We explain how new sites, users and records enter the process, who reviews exceptions and which work remains outstanding.
Information governance becomes useful when ownership, access and system behaviour are visible together. Set the delivery boundary, then move to the specialist evidence needed for the real constraint.
Use these guides to see which technologies can help with the job in front of you.

Workplace, identity, cloud and business applications, connected to a clear implementation or support requirement.
Yes. Start with the repositories and the problem your people are experiencing. A review can identify configuration, ownership or process changes before recommending replacement.
Yes. We can scope information structure, sharing, permissions, migration and the implementation of approved lifecycle requirements. The exact configuration depends on your environment and licences.
Your qualified advisers and records owners establish those requirements. Kritical scopes the technical work needed to implement and verify the decisions they approve.
Describe where information is stored, who uses it and what's getting in the way. An example workflow or repository list is useful; confidential documents and credentials can stay out of the initial enquiry.
Yes. Sharing and permission structures depend on the same identity foundations covered in our identity and access engineering, and the two are often scoped together.
Tell us what you want to achieve, what you have today and when it matters.