Skip to content
Endpoint security renewing? Compare Falcon Complete
Menu

The IT Privacy People

Privacy, engineered.

When personal information is scattered across applications, backups and file shares, ownership, access and retention can be unclear. Kritical maps the systems, builds the controls your organisation has approved and verifies the technical result. We are computer engineers, not lawyers: the service produces technical work and evidence; it does not provide legal advice or certify compliance.

We're not lawyers. Here's the practical IT-delivered side of privacy.

Your lawyer or privacy adviser decides what the law requires of you. We deliver the technical side. We find where personal information sits across your systems, backups and file shares, and who owns each one. We set sign-in, access, sharing and encryption so only the right people can reach it. We match retention and backups to the rules your adviser sets. And we make sure you have the logs, incident route and evidence trail to investigate if you suspect a data breach.

Open governance documents beside a laptop on a desk

Know what personal information your systems hold.

Start with a bounded map of repositories, applications, integrations, backups, owners and access paths across platforms such as Microsoft 365, Business Central, Shopify, file shares and backup systems. The result distinguishes what was observed from what has not yet been established, so the next decision is based on evidence rather than a spreadsheet of assumptions.

Colleagues reviewing working documents together

Turn approved privacy requirements into working controls.

Kritical scopes and implements agreed identity, access, encryption, classification, sharing and data-loss controls. The work starts with the organisation's approved requirements and the systems actually in scope. Platform licences, exceptions, business owners and recovery arrangements are identified before changes are made.

  • Identity and least privilege Review who can reach the information, how administrators authenticate, and where access is broader than the job requires.
  • Information protection Map approved handling rules to available labelling, encryption, sharing and data-loss controls without claiming that configuration alone proves compliance.
  • Retention and defensible disposal Implement decisions made by the organisation's records and legal owners, including the effect of archives and backups. Kritical does not decide the lawful retention period.
Identity and access controls displayed on a workstation

Be ready to investigate a suspected data breach.

A technical response needs usable logs, an incident route, named decision owners and a way to preserve evidence. We help establish those foundations so your organisation and its advisers can assess what happened, which information and people may be affected, and what further action is required.

Prove the technical work without inventing a badge.

The engagement can leave a system and data-flow map, control-and-evidence matrix, prioritised findings, change record, verification results, exception register and handover instructions. The exact deliverables are named in the proposal. Kritical does not issue legal opinions, privacy certifications or a blanket statement that an organisation is compliant.

Team reviewing a control and evidence record
  1. First call

    Confirm the business decision, systems, information and accountable owners in scope.

  2. Read-only assessment

    Collect agreed configuration and evidence without making changes, then separate verified controls, gaps and areas not yet established.

  3. Scoped remediation

    Quote approved technical changes separately, with testing, rollback and handover defined before implementation.

Use the current Australian privacy guidance as the legal reference point.

The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner publishes the current Australian Privacy Principle guidance and data-breach preparation material. Your lawyer or privacy adviser determines how the law applies to your organisation; Kritical uses the approved outcome to scope the systems work.

Separate privacy-control responsibility from system behaviour.

Privacy engineering turns approved requirements into technical controls, but the systems carrying those controls still need evidence. Keep ownership explicit and choose the specialist path that matches the observed problem.

Questions before you enquire

Is Kritical a law firm or privacy adviser?

No. Kritical provides computer engineering. A qualified legal or privacy adviser determines how the law applies and approves the requirements; Kritical maps those requirements to systems, controls and evidence.

Can you start with Microsoft 365?

Yes. A bounded read-only assessment can review the agreed identity, sharing, information-protection, retention, audit and incident-evidence surfaces available in your tenant and licences.

Does the assessment certify compliance?

No. It records the technical scope, observations, evidence, gaps and recommended work. Compliance and legal conclusions remain with the organisation and any appropriately qualified adviser or assessor.

What should we send through the website form?

Describe the decision, systems and timeframe. Do not send passwords, access tokens, payment-card details, breach evidence or confidential records through the public form.

Let’s define the next step.

Tell us what you want to achieve, what you have today and when it matters.

Discuss a privacy-controls assessment